Turbine Technical Due Diligence
Conduct turbine due diligence with a structured, evidence-based toolkit that supports your team and reduces the usual manual evidence sifting overheads.
What Turbine Technical Due Diligence does
Turbine TDD provides ten dedicated tools, including risk assessment, design basis, failure analysis, and contract review.
The RAG matrix simplifies agreement reviews. Select the criteria and automatically scan your knowledge base for evidence. Record a red, amber, or green status, and link supporting evidence directly, then export to Word or Excel.
Contract review tracks clause-level changes across revisions. By comparing versions and logging risks against specific clauses, you can negotiate while being backed by documented history.
The design basis workspace integrates site, turbine, and foundation data from your project's scenario. This ensures the document a reviewer examines matches the data driving your models.
Live · Supply contract - revision 1
33
Criteria across 6 chapters of the agreement
The model extracts the evidence and shows the passage; the assessor sets the colour
What you get with Turbine Technical Due Diligence
-
Ten structured tools
Technology risk, design basis, market study, Q&A template, certification roadmap, failure rates, RAG matrix, climatic conditions, gap analysis and contract review.
-
RAG matrix with evidence attached
Criteria extracted from your own source documents, the supporting extract held against each one, and the rating set by the assessor. Reusable templates, per-organisation scope, and export to Word or Excel.
-
Contract review across revisions
Clause outline, side-by-side comparison between drafts, a risk register linked to specific clauses, and a version timeline showing what changed and when.
-
Design basis built from the model
Parts A, B and C assembled from scenario parameters and library sources, so the site, turbine and foundation described in the document match the ones the cost and yield models used.
-
Failure rate analysis
Component failure rates assessed against reference data and carried straight through to the OPEX model, so the reliability view and the operating cost view are one view.
-
Assessment-ready output
Word and Excel export with evidence and attribution intact, so the deliverable a client or lender receives carries its own audit trail.
Turbine Technical Due Diligence in use
Drawn in the product's own interface, and every figure is real: they come from our live Demonstration project — a 288.75 MW floating wind farm in the central North Sea — and its Default Scenario, so anything shown here can be reproduced in front of you. No client or commercial data appears on this page.
Ten tools for technical due diligence
The due diligence landing page. Each item provides a comprehensive set of tools used for due diligence.
Technical due diligence
A RAG matrix where every rating has its evidence attached
Each workspace opens with a header saying what it is for, then its own layout. The RAG matrix has its settings on the left — template, title, extraction method — and the matrix itself on the right with the Knowledge Base files it reads beside it. 33 criteria across 6 chapters; the model drafts the summary and shows the passage it read, and the assessor sets the rating.
← All TDD modules
RAG Matrix
Extract contract evidence from Knowledge Base files into a Red–Amber–Green criteria matrix.
Knowledge Base files selected: 2 ready
| Chapter | Criterion | What the agreement says | Source and rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Terms | Form of contract | The contract baseline is defined by the Employer Conditions of Contract, which form the basis of the conditions of contract for the SAA. The SAA is a separate agreement for the service and availability of wind turbine generators supplied under the Turbine Supply Agreement. | Green Generic SAA Heads of Terms.docx · relevance 0.59 |
| Scope & Risk Allocation | Scope of work | Design, supply, installation, commissioning, testing and defect rectification of the WTGs and the SCADA system for the floating foundation project, as set out in the TSA Heads of Terms. The Contractor is responsible for providing the necessary logistics. | Amber Generic TSA Heads of Terms.docx · relevance 0.55 |
| Scope & Risk Allocation | Supply ex-works | Ownership of the WTGs and SCADA transfers to the Employer either on delivery to the installation harbour or on payment of the milestone “Upon delivery of components to site (pro rata per WTG)” in Schedule 8. | Green Generic TSA Heads of Terms.docx · relevance 0.49 |
| Scope & Risk Allocation | Transportation | The Employer provides the installation harbour facilities and bears harbour fees and utilities; the Contractor tows the floating foundation and WTG assembly to the offshore location, including mooring and cable connections, at the Employer’s risk and cost. | Amber Generic TSA Heads of Terms.docx · relevance 0.54 |
| Scope & Risk Allocation | Installation | Not yet generated | Unrated |
| Scope & Risk Allocation | Installation port / harbour | Not yet generated | Unrated |
| Price | Contract price | Not yet generated | Unrated |
| Warranties and Liabilities | Power curve warranty | Not yet generated | Unrated |
"You set Red / Amber / Green on each cell — the LLM only extracts evidence" is the product's own wording for this screen, and it is the whole design. Every cell keeps the retrieved passage, its relevance score and the document it came from, so a rating can be checked rather than trusted.
A design basis written from the scenario, not from memory
Part B of the design basis for the Default Scenario. Every parameter is taken from the scenario's own snapshot and cited back to it, and anything the scenario cannot supply is marked as needing a knowledge-base source rather than quietly assumed.
← All TDD modules
Design Basis
Draft Parts A, B and C from the scenario's own parameter snapshot, citing every value back to the record that holds it.
Part B — The Energy Converter (WTG)
Saved| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| WTG model | Generic Direct Drive 11.55MW | Scenario snapshot |
| IEC class | 1B | Scenario snapshot |
| Rated power | 11.55 MW | Scenario snapshot |
| Rotor diameter | 236 m | Scenario snapshot |
| Hub height | 150 m | Scenario snapshot |
| Tower mass / RNA mass | 1,500 t / 900 t | Scenario snapshot |
| Cut-in / rated / cut-out | 3 / 16 / 28 m/s | Scenario snapshot |
| Power and thrust curve | 61-point curve | Library · Turbines (WTG) |
| Tower base OTM, NSS | 311,150 kNm | Scenario snapshot |
| Turbine load cases (DLC) | Not in the scenario | Needs a knowledge-base source |
| Safety factors (turbine) | Not in the scenario | Needs a knowledge-base source |
| Material specifications (RNA / tower) | Not in the scenario | Needs a knowledge-base source |
Contractual position, and what it costs
Read from the OPEX scenario| Position in the agreement | As modelled | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Main component exchange — tow-to-shore vessel and crane Scope & Risk Allocation · Transportation | Employer carries both | £50.41m against exchanging in situ |
| Contractual cap on exchanges inside the agreement Warranties and Liabilities | 4 exchanges | 28.6 expected over 25 years |
| Liquidated damages cap Annual Cap | 1% a year, 2% aggregate | 97.9% warranted availability basis |
The point of holding diligence beside the cost models is that a contractual position has a number attached to it. Who supplies the vessel for a main component exchange is a clause in the agreement and a line in the operating cost — and here they are the same input.
See it on your own project
Book a demo and we will walk through the module with your numbers, not ours.
More of the toolkit
Custom data sources
One library of reference data behind every model, so two scenarios can never mistakenly use different vessel day rates.
Knowledge base
Your project documents, indexed and categorised, feeding the assistant and every diligence workspace that needs evidence.
Digital Technical Assistant
An assistant that knows your documents and your open scenario, cites what it used, and drafts changes you approve before anything is written.